Aldebaran Robotics: Nao

Nao Robot is great…

Read more at www.botjunkie.com and www.aldebaran-robotics.com

Robotics is the branch of technology that deals with the design, construction, operation, structural disposition, manufacture and application of robots. Robotics is related to the sciences of electronics, engineering, mechanics mechatronics, and software
  Title :   Aldebaran Robotics: Nao
  Category :   Robotics Videos.
  Tags :   Aldebaran,  Aldebaran sdk,  nao robot,  robotics, 
Robotics Short Story

The word robotics was derived from the word robot, which was introduced to the public by Czech writer Karel Čapek in his play R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots), which premiered in 1921.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the word robotics was first used in print by Isaac Asimov, in his science fiction short story "Liar!", published in May 1941 in Astounding Science Fiction. Asimov was unaware that he was coining the term; since the science and technology of electrical devices is electronics, he assumed robotics already referred to the science and technology of robots. In some of Asimov's other works, he states that the first use of the word robotics was in his short story Runaround (Astounding Science Fiction, March 1942). However, the word robotics appears in "Liar!"

Posts related to Aldebaran Robotics: Nao:


Comments

25 Responses to “Aldebaran Robotics: Nao”
  1. nadsniper says:

    poor red he wanted his ducckie

  2. furie60 says:

    the infrared wifi voice is programmable, so the red one can hate the blue one,
    thats cool and nice PC programming.
    but i got a error in my own robot,
    he is trying to pick up the floor because he thinks that is a object,

  3. Romashk says:

    Nope.
    action/command -> response

  4. Hauk2004 says:

    DId anyone else go ;_; when the robot got knocked over. :(

  5. thehunnted says:

    Thats amazing

  6. YeahGotYouNow says:

    A. I. ?

  7. steffankaizer says:

    like that robot would understand that telling the truth could have a negative effect and therefore tells a lie. i sure believe that

  8. CyrixLord says:

    Too bad the demo video cuts out the real noise the robot makes, that high pitched gyro gear/whiney noise. . .

  9. pipasasas says:

    lying robots awesome start

  10. AnimeFaaaan says:

    wow the robot squeezes the duckie really hard

  11. SiLeNtKiLlEr31 says:

    that robot s awesome

  12. 86MrDuce says:

    Im gonna need to go to Costco for rubber ducks

  13. elquacko621 says:

    Replace the duck with a baby and this becomes terrifying!

  14. Chivasguy100 says:

    fuckin awesome!!!!

  15. gadgetfreak84 says:

    Bitch stole my duckie!

  16. minidomen says:

    he is smart and what will hapend when zou will ask him for math? he will lie to you

  17. timboak says:

    im pretty sure if i spent $15,600 on one of these i wouldnt accedently knock it over lol. . .

  18. fpc24 says:

    wooooooooooooooooooooooooooow
    i wish i had one!! @. @, im here wondering like what year will these be realieased

  19. Dirtfire says:

    Oh don’t worry, It would be easy enough to program it to not trash things that are moving.

  20. TheArabDude says:

    “about €10,000 (or roughly $15,600)” If you’re single and have that kinda money; give me a call.

  21. TheKrisg says:

    where can i get one?

  22. yzujq says:

    hahaa

  23. stevenrocks1 says:

    I need one of these in my room to keep it tidy :-)

  24. Rickdeckard2020 says:

    Great potential (for slightly bigger bots), imagine having an open source SDK and hundreds of hobbyists making and sharing programs with various functionalities mods and tweeks that can be downloaded into such robots. Utility(clean floor, scrub the toilet, scoop and dump the cats litter, etc) good for handicaped, with internet link you could feed the dog/cat and water plants remotley while on vacation), pick berries

    Its only a matter of time before a lot more manual labor can be automated

  25. 98hellraiser says:

    little bastered lied about the duck!!!!


Do you have any comments on Aldebaran Robotics: Nao ?